Attention: For security reasons,please choose a user name *different* from your login name.
Also make sure to choose a secure password and change it regularly.
Quote from: Herminiaitsch on Today at 05:58:09 AMSo you see one of the main effects is when you change the frequency.What can I change other than changing your first wrong action?
Quote from: Joni98 on July 16, 2025, 09:50:47 AMHello,So you see one of the main effects is when you change the frequency.
I want to create an IP core using the HDL coder in MATLAB Simulink. It's working so far. When I create the IP core, my outputs switch at a different frequency than in the MATLAB simulation. Depending on the settings I use, I'm sometimes closer to the simulation or further away. However, I haven't been able to find the exact frequency after experimenting. I've used the following settings see in the pictures. Are there any "reference settings" for this, or what parameters could be causing the problem? The CLK for the IP core in Vivado is set to 250 MHz (same as the settings in MATLAB). The Simulink model is divided into an embedded C part and an FPGA part. The settings for the C part shouldn't play a role in the IP core generation? Can anyone help, or has anyone already done this?.
Quote from: JH on June 02, 2025, 08:50:31 AMHi,
bitstream itself does not configure PS. This will be done by FSBL, not with bitstream.This is the reason why you didn't see any VIO core, because CLK is missing. In case you want to use PS-PL CLKs and you need only PL part, boot system with your configured PS from SD Card (You can use our prebuilt Boot.bin in case you use the same CLKs like we in our reference design) and overwrite PL over JTAG like you has done above.
br
John
Page created in 0.090 seconds with 21 queries.