I connected the second RAM-Controler to AXI. thats not the fault, but your design helps anyway.
One major fault was that I did not change the default pin-configuration of ZIO and RZQ.
Now have a working design based on XPS 13.2.
My problem: This design is SIMPLE. I had to remove all "my" devices.
Now I can see these differences between your design and mine:
1.) RZQ / ZIO
your schematic: MCB_RZQ_LOC = M19, MCB_ZIO_LOC = C19
your design: MCB_RZQ_LOC = M19, MCB_ZIO_LOC = M16
I think its ok, because we only need an unused pin for ZIO.
2.)
clocks for AXI4, AXI4-lite
your design: AXI4 = AXI4-lite = 62.5 MHz
my design: AXI4 = 100 MHz, AXI4-lite = 50 MHz
3.)
PARAMETER C_MCB_PERFORMANCE = EXTENDED
on 2nd MCB. Cannot be disabled (beside editing system.mhs)
Thoughts:
UG388 figure 3.3 says: "I/O Clock Network To second MCB on same side of device"
Are bank #3 and #1 on the same side ?
Shouldn't we use another BUFPLL_MCB?